Where US money shows up, it builds
A US think tank proposed covertly funding Indigenous lawsuits against Canadian projects. We traced the US money near those projects since January 2025: all we could see goes into building them.
Also in French: Là où l'argent américain apparaît, il construit
In February, a private US think tank, the Defense Analyses and Research Corporation (DARC), posted an essay on how the United States could break Canada apart. Our piece on the interference scare traced how its proposals for Quebec became an election story. It also had a plan for First Nations: "The United States should covertly bankroll these indigenous lawsuits to facilitate the disintegration of Canada." Its list of measures starts with "covert litigation financing for indigenous land lawsuits".1
Event · 2026-02-26 · document · USUS think tank DARC blog post proposes 'covert support for PQ ahead of the election'
Caution: unproven allegation A private think tank's proposal, signed with a pseudonym; no tie to the US government has been established. A claim someone made that nobody has confirmed.
"The Centrifugal Strategy", a post dated 26 February 2026 on the website of the Defense Analyses and Research Corporation (DARC), a private US think tank listing offices in Arlington, Virginia, El Segundo, California and London, and signed with the pseudonym "Mukden", argues the US should seek Canada's "fragmentation, not annexation". It says: "The United States should consider covert support for PQ ahead of the election. These include (1) overt financial support for PQ in the election and (2) psychological operations to foment Quebecois and Albertan separatism, (3) behind-closed-doors trade negotiations with the PQ, where the United States commits to offering lower tariffs on Quebec than on the rest of Canada." It also says "The United States should covertly bankroll these indigenous lawsuits" and lists "covert litigation financing for indigenous land lawsuits" and "State Department funding for Indigenous scholars in Canada". These are the texts behind the September 2026 Quebec interference allegations. Radio-Canada reports The Globe and Mail and Le Devoir referred to them in March 2026. A public document that proposes; no link to the US government and no actual interference has been shown by any authority.
- Defense Analyses and Research Corporation (DARC), “The Centrifugal Strategy”, 2026-02-26.
- Global News, “Federal intelligence agency contacted amid U.S. interference allegations in Quebec election”, 2026-09-25.
- CP24, “Quebec election: Possible interference from U.S. raises questions”, 2026-09-25.
So we followed the US money. We looked for every US dollar we could trace, since January 2025, near a Canadian resource project, and asked which way it went: into building the project, or into a court case against it. The answer is lopsided. All of it we could see goes into building. We found no US money behind any First Nations lawsuit since 2025. But public records only show so much, and that limit is part of the finding: the one route US money has used before, foundation grants, won't show for 2025 until those foundations' returns are published.
| Direction | What we found (since January 2025) | Amount made public |
|---|---|---|
| Toward building | KKR and Apollo fund two Westcoast pipeline expansions | C$2.7 billion |
| Newmont community investment, three Tahltan communities | C$8 million | |
| Pentagon grants: Sisson tungsten mine (New Brunswick), Electra cobalt refinery (Ontario) | US$25 million | |
| Ksi Lisims LNG benefit agreements with three nations; two court challenges withdrawn | Not disclosed | |
| About 5% of LNG Canada, bought from Petronas by MidOcean Energy, managed by US firm EIG | Not disclosed | |
| Supply and capacity contracts at Cedar LNG (ExxonMobil, Ovintiv) | Not disclosed | |
| Toward lawsuits | Any US payment to a First Nations case filed or active since 2025 | None observed (this kind of payment is rarely made public; see the limits below) |
| Unknown | Foreign money at Canadian environmental law charities, donors unnamed | Ecojustice: C$1.48 million from outside Canada in its year to October 2025, country not given |
Money that builds
The largest sum is in pipelines. In August, US investment firms KKR and Apollo agreed to put about C$2.7 billion into two expansions of Enbridge's Westcoast gas pipeline in British Columbia, for a 29% interest in the system.2 The investors are paid from the pipeline's earnings once the expansions run. The money goes to Enbridge's expansions, not to the First Nations that own part of the system.
Event · 2026-08-27 · action · INTLKKR and Apollo (US) agree to put C$2.7B into Enbridge's Westcoast pipeline for 29%
Enbridge announced a definitive agreement on August 27, 2026: KKR and Apollo to invest about C$2.7 billion in the Aspen Point and Sunrise expansions for an indirect 29% interest in the Westcoast system once Sunrise enters service; Enbridge keeps majority ownership and control (Enbridge). The deal closed on September 3, 2026 (Enbridge prospectus supplement, September 10, 2026). This is the only signed new US equity stake in a Canadian pipeline we found; the other new US-managed stake in Canadian gas infrastructure we found is MidOcean Energy's roughly 5% of LNG Canada.
- Enbridge Inc., “Enbridge forms joint venture with KKR and Apollo to fund Westcoast expansions”, 2026-08-27.
- Enbridge Inc. (SEC filing), “Enbridge Inc. prospectus supplement (424B5), section 'Westcoast System Joint Venture'”, 2026-09-10.
- The Globe and Mail, “Enbridge lands $2.7-billion investment from KKR, Apollo in B.C. natural gas pipeline expansion”. paywalled
Some goes straight to communities. Newmont, of Denver, which runs the Red Chris copper-gold mine, announced a C$8 million investment in 2025 for the Tahltan communities of Telegraph Creek, Dease Lake and Iskut, for things like recreation facilities and housing plans.3
Event · 2025-05-26 · action · CA-BCUS miner Newmont announces a C$8M community investment for three Tahltan communities at the Red Chris mine
Caution: self-reported The amount and its uses come from Newmont's own release; no payment record has been published. Only one side’s own account of itself.
For the tenth anniversary of the Red Chris copper-gold mine in northwest BC, which it acquired in November 2023, US-based Newmont announced a CAD 8 million community investment to benefit the Tahltan communities of Telegraph Creek, Dease Lake and Iskut. It was announced at an event in Dease Lake on 24 May 2025 and set out in a Newmont release of 26 May; the money is to fund community spaces, recreation facilities, greenhouse space and housing pre-development (Newmont release).
The US government pays too. The only new Pentagon award performed in Canada since 2025 is US$15 million for the Sisson tungsten project; the only other new money is a second US$10 million for Electra's cobalt refinery, both under the Defense Production Act, according to the US federal spending database.4
Event · 2025-05-01 · action · US/CAUS Department of Defense awards US$15M under Defense Production Act Title III to Northcliff Resources (Sisson tungsten-molybdenum project, New Brunswick); NRCan adds up to C$8.2M
Northcliff announced a US$15M 'non-share dilutive' award under Title III of the Defense Production Act, plus up to C$8.2M from Natural Resources Canada's Global Partnerships Initiative (conditional). The stated aim is to address 'vulnerability in the Critical Minerals supply chain in the United States and Canada'. The announcement discloses no offtake agreement or US priority right. The Gatewell Group DPA tracker lists it as the only Title III award performed in Canada since January 2025, with no US government release.
- Northcliff Resources, “Northcliff announces funding to accelerate development of the Sisson critical minerals project”, 2025-05-01.
- The Breach, “Elbows up? Canada is letting Pentagon take 'unprecedented' stakes in Canadian mines”, 2026-05-22.
- Gatewell Group, “DPA Title III Award Tracker”, 2026-09-28.
Event · 2025-12-08 · action · CA-ONUS Defense Department obligates the second US$10M of its US$20M Defense Production Act award to Electra's Ontario cobalt refinery
USAspending shows a US$10,000,000 obligation on 2025-12-08 on award FA86502425503 (DPA Title III, construction of the Ontario cobalt sulfate refinery), after the first US$10M in August 2024. It is the only new money obligated in 2025-26 on an older DPA award performed in Canada; the only new DPA award in that period is Northcliff's US$15M (Sisson, April 2025). No First Nation partner is named in the award.
Ksi Lisims: agreements, then withdrawals
The clearest case sits on BC's north coast. In October 2025, Metlakatla First Nation and the Lax Kw'alaams Band asked the Federal Court to review Ottawa's approval of Ksi Lisims LNG, whose lead developer is Western LNG of Houston.
Event · 2025-10 · action · CA-BCMetlakatla First Nation and Lax Kw'alaams Band file Federal Court challenges to the federal approval of Ksi Lisims LNG
In October 2025, the Metlakatla First Nation and the Lax Kw'alaams Band filed separate applications in Federal Court for judicial review of the federal environment minister's approval of the Ksi Lisims LNG facility and export terminal near Prince Rupert, B.C., The Canadian Press reported on 23 October 2025. According to the report, Metlakatla said the decision relied on "speculative economic concepts" and ignored "mounting evidence" that the project is not economically feasible. Lax Kw'alaams said the project threatens to displace its Aboriginal rights and title in "perpetuity." On 9 June 2026, both nations signed benefit agreements with Ksi Lisims LNG, whose lead developer is Houston-based Western LNG, and CBC News reported the same day that both had withdrawn their challenges. The release announcing the Lax Kw'alaams agreement, distributed by Western LNG, says the band withdrew its challenge as part of signing, and a Western LNG spokeswoman confirmed that Metlakatla had withdrawn its lawsuit.
- CBC News (The Canadian Press), “First Nations make legal challenges to huge Ksi Lisims LNG project in northwest B.C.”, 2025-10-23.
- CBC News, “2 First Nations in B.C. withdraw legal challenge of Ksi Lisims LNG project”, 2026-06-09.
On June 9, 2026, both signed benefit agreements with the project. The release announcing the Lax Kw'alaams agreement, sent out by Western LNG, says: "As part of signing the Benefits Agreement, the Lax Kw'alaams Band has withdrawn its federal judicial review".5 Metlakatla's release is silent on its case; a Western LNG spokeswoman told The Canadian Press it had withdrawn too.6 A third nation, Gitxaała, which had no challenge, signed agreements that include "financial provisions".7 No amounts were disclosed.
Event · 2026-06-09 · action · CA-BCMetlakatla and Lax Kw'alaams withdraw Federal Court challenges to Ksi Lisims LNG after benefit agreements with the project, led by Houston-based Western LNG
On 9 June 2026, Metlakatla First Nation, the Lax Kw'alaams Band and Gitxaala Nation signed benefit agreements with Ksi Lisims LNG, whose lead developer is Houston-based Western LNG, along with agreements with the PRGT pipeline. The release announcing the Lax Kw'alaams agreement, distributed by Western LNG, says the band withdrew its Federal Court judicial review (file T-4013-25) as part of signing. Metlakatla's withdrawal of its challenge was confirmed by a Western LNG spokeswoman to The Canadian Press. No amounts were disclosed. The project has preliminary supply deals with German utilities.
- Western LNG, “Metlakatla First Nation signs Benefits Agreement with Ksi Lisims LNG and amended Project Agreement with PRGT”, 2026-06-09.
- Western LNG, “Lax Kw'alaams Band signs Benefits Agreement with Ksi Lisims LNG and modernized Project Agreement with PRGT”, 2026-06-09.
- Western LNG, “Gitxaała Nation signs Benefits Agreement with Ksi Lisims LNG and Project Agreement with PRGT”, 2026-06-09.
Calling this US money is mostly right, not entirely. The agreements were signed by the Ksi Lisims LNG partnership, which filings describe as a "wholly owned" Western LNG subsidiary until construction, when the Nisga'a Nation and Rockies LNG, a group of Canadian gas producers, become partners.8 Western LNG's own backers include Blackstone, which anchored a placement of "over $150 million" that closed just before our window,9 and France's TotalEnergies, which took 5% of Western LNG in 2025.10 The pipeline side, PRGT, is co-owned with the Nisga'a Nation.
Money toward lawsuits: none observed
Before 2025, some US foundation money did reach Indigenous litigation. The Seattle-based Wilburforce Foundation, for example, reported a US$35,000 grant in 2022 for "Gitxaala litigation and Mineral Tenure Act reform".11 Such grants were modest. US foundations' returns for 2025 are not yet public.
Event · 2022-11-07 · action · CA-BCWilburforce Foundation reports a $35,000 grant through the BC Assembly of First Nations for 'Gitxaala litigation and Mineral Tenure Act reform'
In the expenditure-responsibility statement attached to its 2022 Form 990-PF, filed with the US Internal Revenue Service (e-filed 9 November 2023, as rendered by ProPublica's Nonprofit Explorer), the Seattle-based Wilburforce Foundation listed a grant of $35,000 dated 7 November 2022 to the British Columbia Assembly of First Nations in Prince George, B.C. The stated purpose was "support for Gitxaala litigation and Mineral Tenure Act reform." The statement reports that the grantee spent the full $35,000, that there was no diversion of funds, and that the grantee reported on 27 April 2023. Amounts on IRS returns are in US dollars.
- ProPublica (IRS 990-PF), “Wilburforce Foundation 990-PF expenditure-responsibility statement, TY2022”, 2023-11-09.
Since 2025 we found no US payment to any First Nations case. The nearest thing is a rise we cannot explain. Ecojustice, a Canadian environmental law charity that acts as counsel in some challenges to projects, reported C$1.48 million from outside Canada in its year to October 2025, up from C$1.06 million, with no donors or countries named.1213 RAVEN, the main crowdfunder for Indigenous lawsuits, reported C$25,297 from outside Canada in 2024.14
Even if some of that money turned out to be American, it would not show an attempt to divide Canada. Ecojustice was already receiving money from abroad in the year to October 2024, before the tariff fight began, and a private donor paying for a court case is not a government carrying out a plan.
Event · 2025-10-31 · document · CAEcojustice's T3010 for fiscal 2025 reports C$1.48M from sources outside Canada, 13% of revenue, up from C$1.06M (9%) a year earlier
For the year to 2025-10-31, Ecojustice Canada Society reported C$1,476,960 of revenue from all sources outside Canada (T3010 line 4575) out of total revenue of C$11,287,464. For the year to 2024-10-31 the two outside-Canada lines (4571 and 4575) totalled C$1,061,316 of C$12,142,842. The return gives no donor names or countries.
- Canada Revenue Agency, Charities Listings, “T3010 Schedule 6, Ecojustice Canada Society, fiscal period 2023-11-01 to 2024-10-31”, 2024-10-31.
- Canada Revenue Agency, Charities Listings, “T3010 Schedule 6, Ecojustice Canada Society (BN 134748474 RR 0001), fiscal period 2024-11-01 to 2025-10-31”, 2025-10-31.
The next big fight has no money attached yet. On October 1, Ottawa listed Pacific Link (West Coast oil pipeline) as a project of national interest under the One Canadian Economy Act (incl. Building Canada Act) (C-5). The Union of BC Indian Chiefs said it "will be hard-fought in the court rooms", and the Coldwater band is considering legal action.15 As of October 3, nothing has been filed and no funder or crowdfund has been named.
Event · 2026-10-01 · statement · CA-BCUnion of BC Indian Chiefs rejects the Pacific Link listing and says it will be fought in court and, if necessary, on the ground
The Union of BC Indian Chiefs rejected the Pacific Link designation. Grand Chief Stewart Phillip said the pipeline takes up "lands in our territories without any form of credible consultation" and that it "will be hard-fought in the court rooms, and if necessary, with boots on the ground" (The Canadian Press, 2026-10-01). No court filing was announced. UBCIC is an umbrella organization, not itself a rights-holder on the route.
- Lethbridge News Now (The Canadian Press), “QuickQuotes: Reaction to the Pacific Link pipeline project”, 2026-10-01.
- APTN National News, “First Nations along Pacific Link pipeline denounce government over lack of consultation”, 2026-10-01.
- Union of BC Indian Chiefs, “UBCIC Rejects 'National Interest' Designation for Toxic West Coast Oil 'Pacific Link' Pipeline”, 2026-10-01.
What cuts against the finding
Most of the money that gets projects built is not American. A group of BC First Nations bought 12.5% of Westcoast in 2025 with a C$400 million federal loan guarantee.16 Five nations can now invest up to C$1 billion in LNG Canada Phase 2, whose owners are British, Malaysian, Chinese, Japanese and Korean companies.17 (MidOcean Energy, managed by the US firm EIG, holds about 5% indirectly.)18 Ottawa has offered Indigenous groups 15% of Trans Mountain,19 and at least 10% of Pacific Link, financed through Canadian and Albertan loan guarantees.20 Canadian taxpayers back these loans.
Event · 2025-07-02 · action · CA-BCA First Nations alliance buys 12.5% of Enbridge's Westcoast gas pipeline for about C$715M, backed by a C$400M federal loan guarantee
Enbridge closed the sale to Stonlasec8 Indigenous Alliance, a partnership of B.C. First Nations (36 at announcement, 38 at closing), on July 2, 2025. The C$400 million guarantee, from a subsidiary of the federal Canada Development Investment Corporation, was the first under the federal Indigenous Loan Guarantee Program.
- Canada Development Investment Corporation, “Federal Indigenous Loan Guarantee Program celebrates first loan guarantee”, 2025-05-15.
- Stonlasec8 Indigenous Alliance LP (GlobeNewswire), “B.C. First Nations to acquire an equity interest in Enbridge's Westcoast Pipeline System”, 2025-05-15.
- Enbridge Inc. (SEC EDGAR), “Enbridge second-quarter 2025 financial results (news release)”, 2025-08-01.
Event · 2026-09-29 · action · CA-BCLNG Canada's partners take the final investment decision on Phase 2, to double the Kitimat plant's capacity to 28 million tonnes a year
LNG Canada announced that its five joint-venture partners, Shell (40%), PETRONAS (25%), PetroChina (15%), Mitsubishi Corporation (15%) and KOGAS (5%), had taken the final investment decision on the Phase 2 expansion of its plant at Kitimat, BC. LNG Canada's release is dated 28 September 2026; the Prime Minister's Office, Shell and TC Energy announced the decision on 29 September. Phase 2 adds two LNG processing units (trains), raising the plant's capacity from 14 to 28 million tonnes a year; Shell said commercial operations are expected to begin in the early 2030s. The Prime Minister's Office and the federal Major Projects Office put the investment at $33 billion, and the Prime Minister's Office, in the title of its release, called it the second-largest single private investment in Canadian history; LNG Canada described it as one of the largest private-sector investments in Canada. The decision lets MNT Investments LP, representing the Gitga'at, Gitxaała, Haisla, Kitselas and Kitsumkalum Nations, exercise an option to invest up to C$1 billion in a special-purpose entity that will buy Phase 2's new LNG storage tank; the Prime Minister's Office and the Major Projects Office describe this as a majority ownership stake in the tank but give different sizes for it (225,000 cubic metres in the Prime Minister's Office release, 255,000 on the Major Projects Office page). Each partner remains responsible for taking its own share of the LNG produced (equity lifting); the releases name no third-party buyers. TC Energy said the decision met the conditions of its earlier conditional investment decision on Coastal GasLink Phase 2, which adds compressor stations (five, according to LNG Canada) to nearly double the pipeline's current capacity of about 2.1 billion cubic feet a day; the Prime Minister's Office says the capacity will double. TC Energy expects construction to start in early 2027 and service to begin in the early 2030s.
- Prime Minister of Canada, “Prime Minister Carney welcomes LNG Canada Phase 2, the second-largest single private investment in Canadian history”, 2026-09-29.
- LNG Canada (via Cision Newswire), “LNG Canada Announces Phase 2 Final Investment Decision”, 2026-09-29.
- Shell, “Shell takes final investment decision to double LNG Canada capacity”, 2026-09-29.
Event · 2026-09-22 · document · CAOttawa offers Indigenous groups a collective 15% equity stake in Trans Mountain, to be financed by a low-cost government loan
The federal government has offered Indigenous groups along the Trans Mountain pipeline a collective 15% ownership stake, The Canadian Press reported on 22 September 2026, citing a Department of Finance letter to a First Nation. The letter said the equity would be distributed "through a low-cost government-provided loan". A spokesperson for Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne said Ottawa was gauging interest among 129 First Nations before setting the size of individual stakes and the terms, and that each participating nation would receive $2.5 million. No stake has yet been transferred. Ottawa bought the pipeline for $4.5 billion in 2018.
- BNN Bloomberg, “Ottawa opens up 15% Trans Mountain equity stake to Indigenous groups on pipeline path”, 2026-09-22.
US government money does not always go with the nations. Wolastoqey leaders have opposed the Sisson mine for years, and the Kitigan Zibi Anishinabeg oppose the La Loutre graphite mine in Quebec, which got a US$8.35 million Pentagon grant in 2024.21 That money still goes into building, but over some nations' objections.
Event · 2024-05-16 · action · US/CAUS Department of Defense grants US$8.35M to Lomiko Metals for La Loutre graphite (Quebec); Natural Resources Canada adds C$4.9M
Lomiko Metals was awarded a US$8.35M Technology Investment Agreement grant under Title III of the Defense Production Act, funded through the Inflation Reduction Act; Lomiko is to match it over 5 years (US$16.7M total) for pre-feasibility, metallurgical and definitive feasibility studies. Natural Resources Canada added a C$4.9M contribution for pilot testing of battery-grade graphite. Ottawa presented this and a parallel award to Fortune Minerals as its first co-investment with the US, under the Canada-US Joint Action Plan on Critical Minerals Collaboration. No offtake was disclosed.
- Natural Resources Canada, “Government of Canada and the United States co-invest to strengthen critical mineral value chains”, 2024-05-16.
- Lomiko Metals, “Lomiko Metals awarded US$8.35M grant from the US DoD in a Technology Investment Agreement and funding of CA$4.9M”, 2024-05-16.
- E&E News, “US military awards $14.8M to Canadian critical minerals firms”, 2024-05-16. paywalled
A Canadian government pays for a lawsuit. Since a 2024 court order, Alberta pays Beaver Lake Cree Nation C$1.5 million a year toward its treaty case over the cumulative effects of industrial development on its lands.22 Alberta's taxpayers fund a case against their own government. Ottawa, also a defendant, had earlier agreed to pay C$2.6 million.23
Event · 2024-08-30 · action · CA-ABAlberta court orders the province to pay Beaver Lake Cree Nation $1.5 million a year in advance costs for its 'Defend the Treaties' case; Canada had settled its share for $2.6 million
On 30 August 2024, the Alberta Court of King's Bench ordered Alberta to pay Beaver Lake Cree Nation $1.5 million a year in advance costs toward its treaty-rights lawsuit, with the Nation contributing $150,000 a year (Anderson v Alberta, 2024 ABKB 524), according to the Nation's law firm, JFK Law. Before the hearing, Canada had reached a settlement with the Nation to provide $2.6 million in advance costs. RAVEN, a charity that raises money for the case, says the Alberta payments continue until the litigation is settled or the trial is complete. The case, filed in 2008, argues that the cumulative effect of industrial development authorized by Alberta and Canada on the Nation's traditional lands infringes its Treaty 6 rights. RAVEN's campaign page says the trial is set for April 2027, while its 2024 annual report says a 160-day trial is set for January 2027.
- RAVEN, “RAVEN Annual Report 2024”, 2026-01.
- RAVEN, “Defend the Treaties”.
- JFK Law, “Court Orders Advance Costs in Decade-Long Litigation over Treaty 6 Rights”.
Some Americans are on the other side, with no money visible. Three US tribal bodies, the Lummi Nation, a Southeast Alaska tribal commission and the Colville Tribes, have asked to intervene in the Gitxaała case at the Supreme Court of Canada.24 The court record names their lawyers, not who pays them. Washington State's governor has criticized Pacific Link over tanker traffic, in a statement.25
Event · 2026-09-21 · action · CALummi Nation and a Southeast Alaska tribal commission seek leave to intervene in the Gitxaała appeal at the Supreme Court of Canada
The SCC docket (file 42200) records a motion for leave to intervene and for an extension of time filed on 2026-09-21 by the Lummi Nation and the Southeast Alaska Indigenous Transboundary Commission, both US tribal bodies; the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation are also listed as a proposed intervener. As of 29 September 2026 their status was pending, and the hearing date had not been set. The docket shows participation by counsel, not who pays.
- Supreme Court of Canada, “Supreme Court of Canada case 42200 (Chief Gold Commissioner of British Columbia, et al. v. Gitxaala Nation, et al.): docket”, 2026-09-29.
Event · 2026-10-02 · statement · US-WAWashington Governor Ferguson and the state Ecology director criticize Canada's Pacific Link listing over Salish Sea tanker traffic
In a joint statement on 2026-10-02, Governor Bob Ferguson and Department of Ecology Director Casey Sixkiller said they were disappointed by the listing and that the pipeline would double Canadian crude moving through Haro Strait and Boundary Pass; they asked for a matching commitment to spill prevention and response (joint statement; also reported by My Bellingham Now). A US state government statement; no money or legal action.
- Office of the Governor of Washington, “Joint statement of Governor Bob Ferguson and Ecology Director Casey Sixkiller on West Coast Oil Pipeline”, 2026-10-02.
- My Bellingham Now, “WA leaders push back on Canada's plan for new oil pipeline”, 2026-10-02.
What public records can't show
"Not observed" is not "does not exist". Covert funding, by design, would not appear in company releases or tax returns. Benefit-agreement amounts and law-firm fee deals are private. Canadian charity returns give one total for foreign revenue, with no donors or countries, and money routed through another Canadian charity shows up as a Canadian gift. The US spending database misses classified spending and sub-awards. And several returns covering 2025 are not out yet.
What would change our finding: a court filing against Pacific Link that names a funder; evidence of who pays the US tribes' lawyers; a new US donor in charity or foundation returns for 2025; or anyone tied to the US administration or to DARC turning up as a donor or counsel in a Canadian case.
For now, the money we can see runs one way. The US firms and governments in this record are paying to get Canadian projects built, and in one case two lawsuits ended after the agreements were signed. The covert lawsuit funding DARC proposed has not appeared in any public record we could check.
Sources
- Defense Analyses and Research Corporation (DARC), “The Centrifugal Strategy”, 2026-02-26. ↩
- Enbridge Inc., “Enbridge forms joint venture with KKR and Apollo to fund Westcoast expansions”, 2026-08-27. ↩
- Newmont, “Newmont Celebrates 10th Anniversary of Red Chris Mine with $8 Million Contribution to Three Tahltan Communities”, 2025-05-26. ↩
- USAspending.gov, “USAspending.gov: award FA86502425503, Electra Battery Materials (Defense Production Act Title III), with a search of awards performed in Canada, 2025-26”, 2026-10-03. ↩
- Western LNG, “Lax Kw'alaams Band signs Benefits Agreement with Ksi Lisims LNG and modernized Project Agreement with PRGT”, 2026-06-09. ↩
- CBC News, “2 First Nations in B.C. withdraw legal challenge of Ksi Lisims LNG project”, 2026-06-09. ↩
- Western LNG, “Gitxaała Nation signs Benefits Agreement with Ksi Lisims LNG and Project Agreement with PRGT”, 2026-06-09. ↩
- The Conversation, “Who benefits from nation-building projects like Ksi Lisims?”, 2025. ↩
- Western LNG, “Significant investment in Western LNG funds Ksi Lisims LNG and PRGT projects to FID”, 2025-01-14. ↩
- TotalEnergies, “Canada: TotalEnergies Signs an Agreement to Export 2 Mtpa of LNG for 20 years from the Ksi Lisims LNG Project”, 2025-05-19. ↩
- ProPublica (IRS 990-PF), “Wilburforce Foundation 990-PF expenditure-responsibility statement, TY2022”, 2023-11-09. ↩
- Canada Revenue Agency, Charities Listings, “T3010 Schedule 6, Ecojustice Canada Society (BN 134748474 RR 0001), fiscal period 2024-11-01 to 2025-10-31”, 2025-10-31. ↩
- Canada Revenue Agency, Charities Listings, “T3010 Schedule 6, Ecojustice Canada Society, fiscal period 2023-11-01 to 2024-10-31”, 2024-10-31. ↩
- Canada Revenue Agency, Charities Listings, “T3010 Schedule 6, RAVEN (BN 854840147 RR 0001), fiscal period 2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31”, 2024-12-31. ↩
- APTN National News, “First Nations along Pacific Link pipeline denounce government over lack of consultation”, 2026-10-01. ↩
- Canada Development Investment Corporation, “Federal Indigenous Loan Guarantee Program celebrates first loan guarantee”, 2025-05-15. ↩
- LNG Canada (via Cision Newswire), “LNG Canada Announces Phase 2 Final Investment Decision”, 2026-09-29. ↩
- EIG, “EIG's MidOcean Energy Completes Acquisition of Interest in Canada from PETRONAS”, 2025-12-17. ↩
- BNN Bloomberg, “Ottawa opens up 15% Trans Mountain equity stake to Indigenous groups on pipeline path”, 2026-09-22. ↩
- Prime Minister's Office, “Prime Minister Carney lists the West Coast Oil Pipeline, now known as Pacific Link, as a project of national interest”, 2026-10-01. ↩
- The Breach, “Elbows up? Canada is letting Pentagon take 'unprecedented' stakes in Canadian mines”, 2026-05-22. ↩
- JFK Law, “Court Orders Advance Costs in Decade-Long Litigation over Treaty 6 Rights”. ↩
- RAVEN, “Defend the Treaties”. ↩
- Supreme Court of Canada, “Supreme Court of Canada case 42200 (Chief Gold Commissioner of British Columbia, et al. v. Gitxaala Nation, et al.): docket”, 2026-09-29. ↩
- My Bellingham Now, “WA leaders push back on Canada's plan for new oil pipeline”, 2026-10-02. ↩