Carnet 49An independent journal, with its receipts
Français

EventDocument

India notifies the WTO of proposed retaliation over US Section 232 metals tariffs (US$1.91B in duties); a second notice on autos follows (dated 3 July, circulated 4 July)

India told the WTO (communication dated and received 9 May 2025, circulated 12 May as G/L/1571 - G/SG/N/12/IND/5) that it proposed to suspend concessions against the US steel and aluminum tariffs, which it treats as safeguards: the US measures affect US$7.6 billion of imports from India, with US$1.91 billion in duties, and India reserved the right to act after 30 days. A second notice on US auto tariffs (G/L/1577 - G/SG/N/12/IND/6, dated and received 3 July, circulated 4 July) covers US$2,895 million of imports and US$723.75 million in duties. A metals addendum (G/L/1571/Add.1, received 8 July, circulated 9 July) raised the metals duty figure to US$3.82 billion after the US doubled its rate to 50%. No evidence was found that India applied any of these measures.

Date
Kind
Tariff action
Where
India
Evidence
Document: An official document: a bill, a filing, an agreement text. How evidence is weighed
Who
United States federal government (target); Government of India (acted)

Latest articles

No article cites this record yet.

Sources

Tested hypotheses: a thought experiment

Suppose Washington foresaw and wanted this. Would this event look any different than under the rival readings? This is a deliberately contrarian test, explained here, not the author’s belief. Judgments, not measurements.

Non-discriminating: this event fits the plain self-interest reading and the foresight reading equally. It does not tell them apart. What this means

ReadingFitWhy
I0a Accident
Tested hypothesis (intent)
Neutral weakThis event concerns India's WTO notices against US tariffs, not Canada; it fits all readings equally and says nothing about Canada's build-out or about Canada as a target.
I0b Plain self-interest; Canada's response not considered
Tested hypothesis (intent)
Neutral weakThis event concerns India's WTO notices against US tariffs, not Canada; it fits all readings equally and says nothing about Canada's build-out or about Canada as a target.
I1 Foreseen and welcomed, not the reason
Tested hypothesis (intent)
Neutral weakThis event concerns India's WTO notices against US tariffs, not Canada; it fits all readings equally and says nothing about Canada's build-out or about Canada as a target.
I2 Foreseen and wanted (this level or higher)
Tested hypothesis (intent)
Neutral weakThis event concerns India's WTO notices against US tariffs, not Canada; it fits all readings equally and says nothing about Canada's build-out or about Canada as a target.
I3 Worked-out plan with specific targets
Tested hypothesis (intent)
Neutral weakThis event concerns India's WTO notices against US tariffs, not Canada; it fits all readings equally and says nothing about Canada's build-out or about Canada as a target.
R-annex Annexation
Rival reading
Neutral weakThis event concerns India's WTO notices against US tariffs, not Canada; it fits all readings equally and says nothing about Canada's build-out or about Canada as a target.
R-frag Fragmentation
Rival reading
Neutral weakThis event concerns India's WTO notices against US tariffs, not Canada; it fits all readings equally and says nothing about Canada's build-out or about Canada as a target.
R-weaken Weaken-Canada rivals (annexation or fragmentation)
Rival reading
Neutral weakThis event concerns India's WTO notices against US tariffs, not Canada; it fits all readings equally and says nothing about Canada's build-out or about Canada as a target.