Carnet 49An independent journal, with its receipts
Français

Pre-registered prediction P2Open

Annexation rival: no deal, whatever Canada passes

This test belongs to the thought experiment about US intent: it states in advance what each reading expects, so the result can count for or against any of them, including the foresight reading.

Registered
Window
No fixed dates
Same window as the "No deal before the law" test (A to A+120 days, where A is the later Royal Assent of Bill C-39 and of the bill containing the Mega Deduction)
Status
Open: The window has not closed; nothing has settled it yet.

What counts

The claim: the goal is to weaken Canada as an independent country, not to get resources out of the ground. There will be no deal, whatever laws Canada passes.

This test covers both rival readings in which the US aims to weaken Canada, scored together because nothing yet separates them. Annexation predicts "no deal ever", not "no deal yet": pressure on Ottawa whatever it does. Fragmentation (the US may be trying to break Canada up, not make it build) predicts no easing when C-39 passes, and engagement with provinces instead: tariff offers aimed at single provinces, contacts with separatists, support for Indigenous litigation that slows the build-out. Its specific signs are tracked in the "Fragmentation watch".

Supported if the pressure continues or escalates past the window of the "No deal before the law" test, especially with renewed sovereignty or "51st state" rhetoric.

What each reading expects

ReadingExpectsIf seen
R-weaken Weaken-Canada rivals (annexation or fragmentation)
Rival reading
Pressure continues or escalates past the window of the "No deal before the law" test; for fragmentation: engagement with provinces instead of easingCounts for it

Observations